![]() 10/15/2013 at 12:08 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
...because it's actually a "Four Wheel Drive Station Wagon". Swearsies.
![]() 10/15/2013 at 12:09 |
|
what about this truck?
![]() 10/15/2013 at 12:10 |
|
![]() 10/15/2013 at 12:12 |
|
Well, yeah, this pic doubles as a picture of a '73 International Loadstar. Also, a 78 Dodge delivery chassis and '90 E/F350 heavy duty, if we play the chassis-under-things game.
![]() 10/15/2013 at 12:13 |
|
Excellent visual aid: the original stamped badge as fitted to the rear, though fitted as by a lot of goofballs to the front grill. With rivets.
![]() 10/15/2013 at 12:17 |
|
So what is your opinion on this matter
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 10/15/2013 at 12:18 |
|
I often refer 4x4 wagons as trucks, as they can haul. They certainly drive like trucks too.
![]() 10/15/2013 at 12:19 |
|
Doesn't goofball describe 98% of Series owners with the other 2% being straigh off the deep end?
![]() 10/15/2013 at 12:29 |
|
Nice Series.. gotta love old rovers!
![]() 10/15/2013 at 12:37 |
|
But it has 2 doors so wouldn't that make it a shooting brake?
"Introducing the new Land Rover All-Wheel-Drive Shooting Brake Not-a-Truck!"
![]() 10/15/2013 at 12:42 |
|
I'd say you're fairly on the money, but a lot of those are consequential things. That is, things trucks tend to have as a consequence of needing to fill Job One. Your standard, as much as ladder frame and other features are usually a part of things, excludes some vehicles on single-point flaws - particularly utes.
Am I prepared to say that a Honda Ridgeline is more a truck, less a truck, or equally not a truck than a Falcon Ranchero? I want to say it's less a truck from personal bias, but a stock Ranchero fails on about the same number of points, just different ones: no ladder frame, straight rear axle but unmeant for loads over 500lb, vs. FWD-basis and severe impairments to use with some cargoes, heavy duty but car-like suspension.
Where then, does this leave, say, the Holden Maloo? Any use for cargo is likely to be basically in line with a hatch + a bit, and suspension-wise it's not terribly serious. But, contrast that with a kei truck that is meant for loads expressly, if only tiny ones. Then draw lines to the Lincoln Navigator - very truckey in some respects, but impractical for quite a lot of loads.
In other words, the "utility" Job One is can be flexible, and a lot of things might almost be truer "trucks" by the standards by pretending really well? I just don't know.
![]() 10/15/2013 at 12:45 |
|
By the shooting brake vs. wagon standard proposed the other day, definitely a shooting brake because the door breaks closer to the rear wheels than the front. Hmm.
![]() 10/15/2013 at 12:45 |
|
The practicality of my sunshading "Safari Roof" in the snow MUST NOT BE QUESTIONED.
![]() 10/15/2013 at 12:52 |
|
Yep. Practicality by damned.
/slightly unserious entry for "4wd wagon"
![]() 10/15/2013 at 13:44 |
|
I guess my Scout doesn't either, as the insurance company has it listed as "Sport Vehicle", whatever the hell that is...
![]() 10/15/2013 at 13:49 |
|
I can't remember if my Rover's title says truck or wagon, to be perfectly honest. The Ranchero actually says truck.
![]() 10/15/2013 at 16:16 |
|
understand completely!